Keith Hagen has
been CEO of QuadraMed since September. His background includes time at Compucare,
one of several QuadraMed acquisitions in the 1990s. You understand, I'm sure,
that he runs a publicly traded company and therefore wisely leans toward a measured
response instead of the freewheeling, "did I really say that?" kind
of pithy quote that you and I both love. Hey, he's a pro and just doing his
job. I was thinking about the preparation it must take to go on record as a
CEO with the SEC, competitors, investors, and analysts hanging on every word.
That must take some composure.
Anyway, I like the company, their technology, and
their products (I've been a customer, so I can say that.) I appreciate Keith's
time and I wish QuadraMed the best. I'm sure Keith would appreciate your dropping
by to hello at HIMSS (take him an "I Am Mr. HIStalk" button if you
think of it) and maybe taking a look at what's new.
You
worked for CompuCare until the company sold out to QuadraMed. Is it good to
be back, or is it like coming back at all?
I
was gone for six years and it’s great to be back. There are so many different
aspects to the business now with the product lines, the great people we have,
and the great customers that I’ve known for a lot of years. It’s nice to be
working with an executive team that I’ve had success with in the past who knows
the industry. I’m thrilled to be back.
What's
changed?
I
left in January 2000. QuadraMed purchased Compucare in 1999. There’s a lot of
business now that wasn’t Compucare. A lot of the business has been sold or purchased
since then. We’ve now got a wide variety of products. Not just Affinity, but
Quantim, TempusOne, lab, radiology, pharmacy, and MPI, We have a much bigger
footprint. We have products in about 1600 hospitals, which is about 25% of the
market. It’s a fuller service business than the Compucare that I left.
QuadraMed
seems to have the technology and the KLAS ratings that people want. Why isn’t
Affinity selling better than it is?
We
sold a lot of Affinity product in 2005. It’s true that we didn’t have a new-name
account, but from a vertical point of view, we sold additional modules to organizations
like Westerly, who had revenue cycle management and purchased our clinical suite.
That’s like a brand new sale, but they just happened to already have revenue
cycle management, so we counted them as a vertical sale. We have maintenance
renewals, where people are continuing to invest in the product. We have 65 Affinity
implementation projects going right now, at 40 different sites. We’ve been our
own worst enemy in setting up this perception that we’re not selling.
The
KLAS report describes life after the demo. Once all the glitz and glimmer is
over, what’s it like during implementation and support? Would you buy from this
vendor again? That’s why I’m so proud of our KLAS reports because it shows the
value that customers get from our systems.
We’ve looked at why we have
trouble signing new-name accounts. One issue is that we have very good and very
aggressive competitors in the HIS space. There are certainly sales forces out
there that are not afraid of negative selling, which they do against us. They
can’t knock our product, our service, or our KLAS ratings, so the only thing
they can grab onto is our overly complex financial report. It takes a lot to
drill through our financial reports to find the truth because you have so many
one-time events that have happened.
We see that on the Affinity side,
but not in other places. With our Quantim product, we’ve signed six contracts
in the $1-2 million range. People are investing in QuadraMed, but our competitors
have done a great job in creating FUD – fear, uncertainty, and doubt – in the
sales process. We have a very strong balance sheet, $34 million in the bank,
and are a solid, stable company. We’re emerging from the issues we’ve had and
I look forward to competing with a very strong income statement that’s as strong
as our balance sheet today.
We have no marketing, no messaging, no brand
awareness. The market only knows us by what our competitors say about us. We’ll
invest in that area in 2006 well above what we’ve done in the past.
What
do you see as the biggest competitive threats to QuadraMed?
They
are the things we’ve talked about. We have strong products and great KLAS ratings.
Our threats come from positioning of our products, brand awareness, and getting
our message out that we’re financially stable, very much in business, and very
much here to serve our customers.
Some
folks have said that Larry English’s job was to stabilize the company, but because
of the company’s problems, he stayed on too long when the company really needed
a more aggressive innovator. Is that fair?
I think Larry
did a great job leading the company when the company needed him. I come to QuadraMed
with a very different background, style, and approach. My goal is to make QuadraMed
relevant again in the healthcare market. Everything that I’m doing is looking
forward and driving the business forward.
We’re focusing on putting
together a clear strategic plan. We’ve not done a good job making it clear to
everybody in the market and even in the company “why QuadraMed,” how we’re different.
And why someone would buy from us instead of our competitors. The message will
be clear, concise, and well communicated.
Is
QuadraMed’s executive turnover positive in any way?
What we’ve got
today is an outstanding leadership team with many years of healthcare IT experience.
We’re all client advocates, we’re all very focused on growth. If you look at
our team, we’ve got Jim Klein, nearly eight years as VP and research director
at Gartner. Jim Milligan is an absolutely outstanding sales leader with 20-plus
years of experience. Steven Russell has an outstanding background to drive our
strategic planning process and get our message out. I’ve got 22 years of healthcare
IT.
It’s a team that knows the market and the products. We’re also all
here in the Reston office, the first time in many years that the executive team
is in the same building working together. We joke about the Blues Brothers movie
– we’re getting the band back together and moving the organization forward.
With
staff turnover and office closures, do you have enough experienced people to
keep up the R&D and support that the market expects?
We absolutely
do. We have people and resources to accomplish our mission. Look at what we
put out in 2005 – prescription writing, account workflow, biller worklist, enhancements
to Quantim, MPI. We’ve put out a rich set of features and functions. We’ve got
a long list for 2006, both financial and clinical. We’re putting out good releases
and have more than enough resources to accomplish what we need to accomplish.
Is
more restructuring needed?
It’s always tough
to manage staffing levels. We’re certainly focused on being a profitable company
and making sure that we’ve got a strategy and the resources to grow our top
line. We’re always going to invest in the areas that are strategically important
to us and make sure that we’re a profitable company.
Do
you think GE’s acquisition of IDX was a good idea?
I think it was
wise. IDX is strong in the large medical teaching facilities. It’s not surprising
that GE would look to someone with a presence in those large organizations.
Some
people compare QuadraMed to MEDITECH - similar technology, customer size
sweet spot, and a rich history. Do you see the resemblance?
There are similarities.
We tend to try to be in the hospital size that would be at the top of the MEDITECH
range. Half our base is hospitals under 200 beds. We have one product that scales
from USC Medical Center, one of the largest medical centers in the country,
all the way down to 100 beds. We scale higher and have a different implementation
methodology that works better in larger organizations. We have a much more consultative
approach where MEDITECH is a more of a "one size fits all” model.
What
do you see as QuadraMed’s strengths in products and services going forward?
The big strengths
are industry leading products that can work standalone: TempusOne, MPI, Quantim.
They’re strong as individual products. We also have strength bringing them together
as an enterprise offering as Affinity and integration to put them together.
Scalability is a big strength of the product. Our proven ability to deliver
long-lasting value is a strength.
Our revenue cycle management product
is viewed as a top product in ratings and in talking to customers with their
very low AR days using our product. On the Quantim side, we’re the only vendor
with a full suite of products that mirror the AHIMA eHIM model that defines
how to run an HIM organization in a large healthcare setting. TempusOne is certainly
a leading scheduling product.
What
steps have you taken to get value from the PharmPro, Détente Systems,
and Tempus product acquisitions?
It’s an area we
haven’t done enough in. We’ll focus foward on maximizing value from those acquisitions.
We’ve done things with TempusOne, tying it into MPI so you can use our MPI Spy
product with TempusOne. As of January 1, we’ve rebranded it as QuadraMed TempusOne
to get awareness out to CIOs who love the TempusOne products that it’s part
of the QuadraMed family and has been for nearly two years. We have other products
providing the same level of service and value and would like them to consider
us for their short lists.
We’ve consolidated all sales under Jim Milligan
and products under Jim Klein. That will drive integration of product and cross-selling
into the customer base. Radiology is going in now at Gillette in Minneapolis.
That includes PACS integration through our partnership with Cedara.
We’ve
been cross-selling PharmPro into the Affinity customer base. CPOE and closed
loop are things we’re looking at as we finalize our strategic plans, but no
final decisions have been made.
It’s
a hot healthcare IT market. How do you get QuadraMed back into it as a major
player, particularly in the clinical area?
We’re working
with Pam Arlotto of Maestro Strategies to help us refine our strategy and value
proposition. You’ll start to see the results from that in the middle of March.
At HIMSS, you’ll see us continuing our theme of "Powering the path to paperless,"
which we first launched with Quantim at AHIMA as paperless HIM. We’re helping
customers attain an EHR model at a reasonable level of investment.
Consensus
is that QuadraMed wants to start selling again and then hope to be acquired,
which seems in line with your background of having worked at two HIT companies
at the time they were taken over. Comments?
I’m aware of those
perceptions, given my background. But to put it in perspective, it’s all about
creating shareholder value. Compucare was a private company. In order to get
shareholder value, the business had to be sold. Sunquest was a public company,
but the founder controlled almost 80% of all the shares, so it was almost a
pseudo-public company. To get shareholder value, the business had to be sold.
QuadraMed is a real public company with a lot of shares spread out in
a lot of hands. So, getting shareholder value from this company means having
a business that people want to invest in. As more people invest, the share price
goes up and you’ve created shareholder value without having to sell the business.
My focus is on building a strong and profitable company that meets the needs
of our customers and builds value for shareholders.
Is
it cool having your first CEO job in a publicly traded company?
It’s
cool. It’s a two-edged sword. It’s great because you get visibility, but also
tough because you get visibility. The rules and regulations are significant.
But I really enjoy it.
It takes a broad knowledge on a lot of topics.
What I’ve tried to do through my career is build that broad knowledge, get involved
in various aspects of the business, whether it was part of my day job or not.
You go through your career checking boxes and gaining experience in all these
areas – finance, management, sales, leadership – and then you work to position
yourself to be considered. Its like selling software – you have to get on the
short list enough times to be successful. I had a great opportunity to run Misys
Transaction Services and what I learned there positioned me for the role I have
today.
Can
QuadraMed succeed over the long term without being acquired?
Certainly.
What would you tell customers and investors that would convince them that to place their trust in QuadraMed?
That’s an interesting
question. It’s two different groups and message. On the investor side, we’ve
got strong products and happy customers. We’re in a very good market. We have
market share. We have a clear trending toward profitability. We generate cash
from operations. Our stock is undervalued compared to other stocks in our market,
at least in my opinion.
On the customer side, we have the strong KLAS
ratings, which are a definition of life after the demo. We have a long history
of serving our customers. We have a strong balance sheet and a large customer
base. We have strong sales with Affinity verticals, Quantim, TempusOne, and
MPI. We have products that can provide value.
Let’s
say I’m watching QuadraMed closely for the next year. What signs should I look
for that tell me that Keith Hagen is going a great job as CEO?
The first thing
is profitability. Having our income statement look as good and as clean as our
balance sheet. Having the market know what QuadraMed stands for and how we differentiate
ourselves. An increase in our sales bookings.
Who
do you admire most in the industry?
This
is absolutely the truth, not any showboating. I truly admire those people running
hospitals and IDNs that are working hard to have a profitable business while
delivering quality care. What could be more important and noble than taking
care of sick and injured people? Certainly more them than people running software
companies.
Do
you read HIStalk?
I do. But most importantly, my wife reads it. She’ll call me on a regular basis to tell me what’s on HIStalk. No matter what I might think I’ve accomplished in my career, in my wife’s eyes, my greatest accomplishment will be being interviewed on HIStalk.
Tim, great interview as always.