Monday Morning Update 2/19/07
posted 02/17/2007
HIStalk
From Michael Florimbi:
"Re: our company.
HISTALK is, in my opinion, the best source of information on healthcare
of any blog out there, keep up the good work! I am the founder and
chairman of LingoLogix. Our specialty is the interpretation
and codefying of unstructured medical digital records."
I'll cut his plug a little short since that's what sponsors pay to run
here and I'm not feeling all that pro bono-ish at the moment, but since
he led off with a play to my ego (good move!) I'll include the
company's web
address.
From
Alan Stanwyk
"Nobody made fun of
the flying good time Cerner is having with its aircraft? I know that
this kind of deal is fairly common, but man, what a convoluted read to
figure out who is paying whom for what!" Link.
Cerner is paying for the operating costs of Neal and Cliff's BeechJet
400, which seems to be priced at $3-5 million and up. Or at
least that's how reads to me. Hangaring is $8,000 a month and pilots
run $850 a day.
Rebecca Onie,
Executive Director of Project
Health, re-sent her response to the "Beers with Bush"
fundraiser whose proceeds will benefit their organization. "Wow! This is fabulous.
Athenahealth is a long-time supporter of Project HEALTH. Interestingly (given your blog’s focus on
healthcare technology), one element of the partnership is customizing
athenahealth’s technology interface for Project
HEALTH’s Family Help Desk programs, which use the
doctor’s visit to connect low-income families with the
community resources they need to be
healthy. I’ve included a photo of a child
from the Asthma Swim Program, which is the program where the funds
would be used. All funds raised will be used to provide
goggles, swimsuits, towels, and other equipment for participants in
Project HEALTH’s Asthma Swim Program, which provides
low-income asthmatic youth with disease management education and safe
cardiovascular exercise, including swimming. Participants learn asthma
control habits, such as avoidance of triggers and proper use of
medications, that reduce their symptoms and allow them to manage their
disease with confidence. Thank you so much for arranging this.
We are eager to see the results!" Rebecca co-founded
Project Health as a Harvard sophomore, went to Harvard Law, clerked for
a civil rights law firm, then came back as Executive Director a year
ago. The proceeds will help kids and I appreciate all who have
bid so far. I'll contact the winner after the bidding
closes at 6:00 p.m. Eastern on Wednesday. And if you want your
name and employer left off HIStalk, that's OK - just say so.

From Union Jack: "Re: Beers with Bush. What's
all this then? It's not very 'affirmative action' of you, is it? How do
you suppose your loyal readers across the pond will be able to meet Mr.
Bush, even if they wanted to? And what about poor student researchers
who would love to bid but can't, their bank accounts being less healthy
than radioactive sushi? To make matters worse, what about student
researchers across the pond, eh? For shame. Mr. HIStalk, for shame. I'm
joking, I'm sure you've realised, although it's a shame I can't bid
(for the aforementioned reasons), but I will continue to participate
vicariously in the US healthcare industry. Thanks for doing such a
marvellous job, I've been reading your blog for about 2 years now, and it's
definitely made a difference. Over the past week, it seems you've been
working overtime, churning out posts with remarkable regularity, and
hats off to you. It makes us students, who take 4 years to come up with
a 100 page thesis look really bad." Thanks for the nice
comments, especially the "what's all this then", which is my favorite
(favourite?) Monty Python line of all time. I did think about the
bidding advantage that large wallets have over small, but since it's
for charity, decided to let my beloved supply and demand curve work as
nature intended. Maybe we should have arranged a scholarship, although
you'd still have the travel cost. Don't worry about being a poor
student - most of who are old and relatively well off financially would
give it all up to trade places (hair, coeds, hell-raising capacity, and
lack of creaks and aches.)
Art Vandelay (another great Seinfeld-inspired phony name!)
sent a detailed, thoughtful comment about Epic that I thought deserved
to be in the main body of HIStalk instead of as a footnote. It's long,
but worth a read: "Re:
Epic - their product is highly configurable and has many intersecting
points of configuration (ex: masterfiles, picklists, installation
choices). This causes challenges for many organizations because there
is rarely a single and central vision for this large of a system.
Groups will ask for conflicting installation choices, create
conflicting processes, and it takes a long time to sort this out. Be
clear about the costs that get out-of-line = hardware, software,
consulting, Epic professional services. I believe the out-of-line costs
are caused by organizations under-estimating the upfront analysis, time
it will take for consensus-building, the complexity of business process
redesign, the complexity of changing an organization's old habits, and
the complexity of interfacing. In my experience, every organization's
decision-making hierarchy, culture, consistency in processes and
commitment to a set of common non-conflicting strategies (ex: make the
safest environment possible, increase revenue capture) and technical
and project management maturity is vastly different. You can have a
basic framework and a set of tools but all this requires tailoring to
the organization. No one wants to admit how much work and challenges an
organization will face when striking the balance between changing
processes to work within the system's capabilities. If you believe my
hypothesis, how much is caused by Epic, how much is caused by
consultants working on a by-the-hour contract, and how much is caused
by the issues within the organization (ex: lack of project management
skills, lack of strong leadership and a small set of non-conflicting
focused goals for the installation, commitment to breaking-down
organizational barriers to change/optimize processes)? Furthermore, I
believe many CIOs are guilty of not telling the truth (or they can't
because they fear they will lose their job) with the rate of change
they believe the organization consume. In other words, the
organization's eyes are bigger than its stomach. The Epic Product Line
is MASSIVE (ex: CPR, HIS, Practice Management, Enterprise Scheduling,
OR, ED, Intensive Care, Call Center, Oncology, Cardiology). Everyone
wants everything first and no one is willing to accept a long-term
transformation AND stick with the plan. It took "x" years to get the
systems entrenched into an organization, it will take a long-time to
retrench the new systems into the organization. As Mr HISTalk has said,
CPOE and documentation don't necessarily provide the benefits that
other functions do. All the preachers in the organization want these
fringe functions but they have no clue the maturity of these functions
and the dedication it takes to make them happen. The organizations that
are successful with CPOE took 5+ YEARS to get there, not 1-3.
Implementing these consolidated applications is a long-term commitment
and it will take a long-time to assimilate the functions and benefits
into the organization. IT leaders need to help make this understood and
clinical and administrative leaders need to listen, be realistic and
partner to with the vendor, IT and the front-line users to work through
the challenges in a consistent manner." Well, that
summarizes just about everything you need to know about a large-scale
clinical systems implementation. You can't blame the vendor for the
customer's irrational exuberance about how much better their
organization is at managing change, gaining consensus, developing ROI
and success metrics, and pushing every day for years to make
improvements. Thanks for the post. I've seen these exact
issues come to life more than once.
From Napoleon Dynamite:
"Do you have an RSS
(Atom) feed?)" Yes. The link
is to your left, with feeds for RSS, Atom, My Yahoo, Google, and My
MSN.
From HitMan:
"Re: VeriSign
investment in Healthvision. I don't quite see the synergy."
That came right before I ran my Scott Decker interview, so I'm
hoping it answered the question.
From Disappointed:
"Re: your HIMSS quick
poll. This poll is trash. Why bother polling for such garbage
information. Who cares? This blog is for healthcare IT and not
a dating service. Right?" I care! I want to look at the
surging throngs at HIMSS, intense and focused, dressed to the
nines, sporting frozen smiles of fake collegial good will, and I want
to know: what's happening back in those hotel rooms? Am I the only one
going home alone to TV and room service, or is debauchery widespread
and I'm just missing it by being steadfastly and quaintly faithful? I'm
comforted by the 65% of 112 respondents who are in my cohort in saying
there's no chance of shenanigans for them in New Orleans. Therefore, I
can spend my evenings writing HIStalk without feeling like a loser.
See, that's relevant. Say, maybe I should run a poll about the New
Orleans hooker environment.
From Hey Soos Patines:
"Re: CHW CIO. Has
left 'unexpectedly'. No information on a replacement or process was
give to the staff." Couldn't find out who that is in from
Catholic Healthcare West's federal forms, but boy, do they reward their
executives richly: Humble servant CEO Lloyd Dean made $5.8 million in
compensation and benefits in 2005. Read that again slowly ... the guy
running a nonprofit
hospital group out-earned most publicly traded company
CEOs. So much for a vow of poverty. Even their HR VP made $1.9 million.
What the hell is that all about? You're telling me that a Catholic-run
hospital group has to pay $1.9 million a year to get someone to run HR?
And they're supposed to be a non-profit? Ridiculous.
Excessive. Embarrassing. I'm not out of adjectives, but I'll stop.
From Sonomaca:
"Re: New Orleans
violence." Link.
Nine people shot in less than seven hours as Mardi Gras gets going.
Police make the best of it: they say the shootings did not occur on
parade routes and were not random. It's like any city, with bad
neighborhoods and dangerous hours to be running around. I plan to avoid
both.
From MH: "KLAS is not what you think.
Several (more than 10) of our clients have called to tell us that while
being interviewed by KLAS, they felt guilty about saying anything
positive about Cerner, McKesson, or vendors other than Epic. The phone
interviewer would follow up with 'are you sure you want to rate them
that high? No one else has.' I know the KLAS folks and they are very
biased toward Epic." If anyone in the know wants to add their comments, feel free.
The number of HIStalk readers continues to astound me. I see that, in
the first 17 days of February, it had 78,325 total hits, and that's
without writing any more often than I usually do. The all-time record
was during the Kaiser excitement in November, with 133,004, so I humbly
expect the record to fall this (short) month. Just one year ago, it was
68,295 for the month, and the year before that, 17,528. Projected visitors: 46,354 per
month. Total pages views since I started HIStalk in mid-2003 will hit 1
million in the next few days (and that reader will get a brand new Ford
Mustang! Well, maybe not.) Next month or so, I'll run the reader survey
again and hopefully will learn more who's out there and what you want
(other than smut polls.) One thing I've learned, though: I can never
keep everyone happy. There's no fine line I can walk when talking about
a vendor, technology, or person that won't elicit cries of favoritism
or bias from both sides.
My biggest lesson learned in these nearly four years: it's hard work.
No wonder most blogs lie fallow, starting with great promise and
commitment but quickly going to seed with less-frequent and
less-informative posts, finally petering out entirely as a monument to
human weakness. If HIStalk fails, it won't be because I didn't work at
it.
Australian HIT vendor IBA is in
the running for iSoft. You may remember IBA's deal to
provide clinical software for Kodak to resell, which kind of fizzled
out.
Tick Tock e-mail sighting!
Forbes features Neal Patterson as a case study in "Are You An
A$&*@^?" They said: "Another
example is when Neal Patterson, the CEO of Cerner, wrote a nasty e-mail
to people in the company telling them they weren't working hard enough
and that he wanted the parking lot filled with cars from 6:30 a.m. to 7
p.m. and half-full on Saturdays. The note was leaked to the media and
the stock went down 22% in three days." Maybe he should
take their quiz.
As I read the questions, I couldn't help but think of one of the
creepiest, saddest movies ever made: In the Company
of Men. The Chad character is completely psycho. I always
think I want to watch it, but then I turn it off after a few minutes
because it's just uncomfortable.
Rob Fahy joins
HTP, Inc.
Now what's this about? Joe Petro is
announced as the new SVP of Product Development for Eclipsys,
with John Gomez now CTO only? Is that a downgrade? I'd gotten a couple
of Rumor Reports suggesting he was on his way out (one was from TenaciousD, who I'd
put in temporary time-out for his erroneous layoff report) and I'm just
not sure what this change means. Lots of new guard there.
David Brailer pops up from obscurity, telling
a magazine that IT could cut healthcare costs in half, but only after a
decade of implementation. Seems optimistic, but he's talking about
major redesign, not just hooking up EMRs.
Rockingham Memorial Hospital (VA) names
Mike Rozmus as VP of IS and Richard Haushalter as CIO. I don't believe
I've ever seen those positions separated, but the new CIO was formerly
the CFO.
UPMC's co-development deal with Alcatel-Lucent is
announced in France, with each party kicking in $25 million
of seed money.
Some New Zealand HIT vendors visiting Canada warn
that docs need a reason to use EMRs. In NZ, 95% of GPs use
computer-based records, apparently encouraged by a combination of
financial assistance and outcomes-based payments. Money alone failed
there, he said.
Siemens already pleaded guilty in the Stroger phony bidding scandal and
now the three individual defendants do
the same. Two of them work for Siemens (one being their
attorney) and the other owned the company that pretended to be a
minority-owned Siemens partner in return for cash.
The US patent office will re-examine
Visicu's patent after a request from iMDsoft. Here's an HIStalk
flashback from December 7, 2004: "Maybe Visicu should have
kept quiet about its claimed ICU monitoring system patent. Israeli
company iMDsoft asks the patent office to validate that their 1996
patent trumps Visicu's 1999 one. Visicu's legal ambitions may gain them
nothing except the pleasure of writing royalty checks to a company that
appears to have just one US customer." Visicu prevailed -
then, anyway. The stock hasn't reacted much, but the announcement got
little attention so far.
News, rumors, invitations for that cookies-and-milk pajama party at
HIMSS: e-mail me.