From Anonymous:
"Re:
Epic. Phillips has sold Xtenity products- they've got a customer installing
and the Philips folks are learning the ropes. Business for Epic has slowed down
a bit, although the analysis management is giving out is that Epic's target
market is saturated, mostly with Epic sales. While most folks have fixated on
Kaiser or maybe Allina, Epic has sold to a bunch of customers and has quite
a few installs underway. From what I've heard about competitors (not much),
the slowdown is not limited to just Epic. There's quite a bit of experience
with Epic's inpatient products now, with lots of areas identified for improvements.
Despite being at the top of the KLAS ratings, no one's under the impression
in the company that there's isn't lots to do to make a better product, and as
the pace of the Inpatient/Hyperspace/Care Everywhere/Xtenity frenzy slows down
a bit, performance and useability are getting huge amounts of resources put
in."
From Drew:
"If
you haven't already, try this
site
out. They do a good job of exposing me to stuff I like, but had never heard
of before. Where was I when Eva Cassidy was alive?"
He's proposed a big winner: music recommendation engine Pandora, by the the
Music Genome Project (a fascinating business
story,
with their technology being licensed for kiosks in stores like Best
Buy to help people looking for new music.) It's uncanny - you tell it one
song or artist you like and it builds a personal streaming radio station with
music you'll probably like equally. In my case, I said I like Yes, so I'm
listening to (and liking) Be Bop Deluxe, which I'd heard of but never listened
to (Eva Cassidy sounds good, too.) Addicting and free if you don't mind ads
or $36 a year otherwise. Stunningly cool and gets you out of that music rut
you've been stuck in since college. Those geniuses ought to make a mint.
From
Matchless:
"The
Siemens Global Innovation Network stated mission is all about clinical systems
and based on their exit from several healthcare markets (general financials,
payroll) the rumors of their pending divestment from the patient accounting
space should be given some weight. If we add to this the unconfirmed sale
of the European rights to their patient accounting systems to SAP, their exclusive
North American ERP partner, it certainly appears SMS clients could be in for
another rough ride.” Siemens/SMS
has had plenty of non-clinical course changes, going back to PeopleSoft, Scheduling.com,
etc. From the cheap seats, they just look confused and indecisive, especially
for a company whose own highly touted offering is floundering.
From Anonymous:
"Re:
HIMSS hype. Although I did not attend HIMSS this year so I don't know first
hand, the author of this
article
seems to think there was less hype at HIMSS this year: 'The 2006 HIMSS conference
might best be remembered for what did not happen. People didn't buy the hype
-- and for that matter, the nearly 850 vendors and other exhibitors didn't have
much flash and dash to dish.' I can hardly believe that is true, however."
There
was at least a perception of less hype, mostly because there was not a single,
vendor-friendly hot issue on the radar like CPOE, HIPAA, or PDAs in the
past (other than RHIOs, which the big-boothed crowd obviously has little reason
to support, tout, or even acknowledge.) For that reason, the hype was more vendor
individualistic instead of communal. Certainly there was the usual abundance
of superfluous glitz, jolly glad-handing, and pompous self-importance (from
both vendors and star-power attendees alike) but the multi-storied booths didn't
hide the fact that vendors are pitching the same products from previous years
to the same people who already know about them. I'd like to think that unbiased information
from HIStalk and other sources has made it harder to hide behind the hype and
therefore less advantageous to sling it, but that's me doing my own hyping.
From
The
PACS Designer:
"As
to the discussion on how Philips is doing with Xtenity, the word I'm hearing
is fine. As with any new system there are always minor hiccups before users
become comfortable with the new work process and the resulting job reassignments
and any bugs are removed from the system. The first order was taken in March
of last year and the first brave customer was Metro Health Hospital, Grand Rapids,
Michigan. If you want to know how things are now, talk to them. When you
have two best of breed suppliers, Philips and Epic, working closely together
good things are bound to happen. Happy customers are your best sales brochure!"
Thanks
to everyone who e-mailed me in response to my weekly Inside
Healthcare Computing
editorials. I'm surprised how much better my rants sound when they've been edited
by a pro like Steve Larose over there. They're offering a great subscription
deal
for HIStalk readers if you're interested.
Diagnosis software maker Isabel
gets a NY
Times
mention.
"A BIG part of the answer is that all of the other medical progress we
have made has distracted us from the misdiagnosis crisis ... [Isabel physician]
Joseph Britto, a former intensive-care doctor, likes to compare
medicine's attitude toward mistakes with the airline industry's. At the
insistence of pilots, who have the ultimate incentive not to mess up,
airlines have studied their errors and nearly eliminated crashes. 'Unlike pilots,' Dr. Britto said, 'doctors don't go down with their planes.'"
Shahid,
aka The Healthcare IT Guy, was nice enough to post
an answer
to the question asked here about why legacy vendors don't jump on CCOW.
Are
Canadian hospitals better off buying bigger and better marketed software from
the US, or should the difference in healthcare delivery sway them toward born-in-Canada
products? Says
Mark Groper of Dinmar (Oacis): "One is the funding. It still isn't there. A
lot of the money that Canada Health Infoway has, still hasn't been
spent. The other is the procurement practices and policies
that make it very difficult for companies like ours to secure the
business. The U.S. companies we compete against are much larger, and
they spend a lot of time lobbying the provincial and federal
governments. A lot of [buying] decisions aren't necessarily made on the
basis of what's the right product."
South
Carolina's Palmetto Health signs
up
for MercuryMD's mobile physician solution.
Idiotic Hospital Lawsuit
of the Week, as recommended by Matthew
Holt.
A Canadian hospital assisted one of their nurses when she complained of harrassment
by her ex-boyfriend, a physician also employed by the hospital. They helped
her prepare paperwork for a restraining order but the court was slow to act,
so they also assigned escorts to her and gave the physician a different
shift, reluctant to fire him due to lack of evidence. The doctor stabbed her
to death in the hospital and then killed himself by injecting an unidentified
substance. The nurse's father, mother, sister, and grandmother are
suing
the hospital, hospital administration, the physician's estate, and his psychiatrist
for $13.5 million.
CIO Field Report
| Sponsored
Announcement from HIStalk |
This
seems like a stretch: a former McKesson VP was implied by his new employer to
have single-handedly driven
sales
"from $0 to $3.5 billion over a period of five years."
Wouldn't commissions that large put him on a Caribbean island instead of in
a new sales management job?
Great Q4
numbers
for Eclipsys: revenue up 21%, EPS to $0.10 from -$0.06, meeting Wall Street
expectations. For FY05, EPS was $0.01. The long-awaited profit has arrived.
The stock jumped on heavy trading, hitting a new 52-week high. If their Sunrise
4.5 medication management offering is any good, they should make some sales.
Andy can't take much credit yet, but clearing out Mahogany Row was a good signal
that things needed to change. As long as he and John Gomez get along, I expect
good things from them.
CalRHIO is having its third
summit
despite having not yet started a pilot project. They're developing standards
and infrastructure like everyone else (many of those pioneers will be dead
wrong and forced to re-do it all in a few years) but I do like this goal: "A recommended clinical data set will be released soon to help data
sources understand what they must be able to provide to participate in data
exchange, help data users understand the kind of information they will be able
to obtain, and define for consumers the information that will be shared with
authorized users."
Now if they'd just release a report card of who's able to provide that (and
the systems they're using to do so) I'd be happy. Hospitals and physician offices
should be graded on their use of technology the same way vendors are for developing
it (and I don't mean Most
Wired.)
Computerworld
correctly identifies
a lack of hospital funds as a barrier to the interoperability lovefests going
on, but then says this: "Because many hospitals run on 20-year-old IT
systems, smaller institutions are often left behind, while leading ones
forge ahead."
Well, I know lots of big, leading hospitals and most of them run clinical software
at least 20 years old. In fact, most of the shiny displays on the HIMSS floor
were selling
software that's at least 20 years old. Old stuff: GE/IDX, QuadraMed, MEDITECH,
Misys, most of McKesson and Siemens. Relatively new (10 years or so): Cerner,
Eclipsys, Epic. Architected and developed in this millennium: zero.
The
HIMSS survey says
25% of hospitals have fully implemented EMRs. I say the respondents are full
of crap, well-intentioned but obviously unaware of the high standards required
to call that particular work done. Do they really have paperless charts, electronic
MARs, interface clinical instrumentation, and systems that meet the Institute
of Medicine's Gold Standard for EMRs? I'm sure they've paid for EMR applications and
may have even implemented everything their vendor offers, but I'd bet money
that less than 1% of them really have a true EMR up and running in all care
settings. Maybe less than 0.1%.
The Burlington layoffs begin
as GE starts shedding former IDX employees. The company claims few will
be impacted, not much consolation to those who were or may be.
Surgery
patients in the UK will
wear RFID bracelets that link to
EMRs, provided by Safe
Surgery Systems. Great idea.
Will
electronic medical records make healthcare less expensive? No,
according to 2/3 of consumers. 86% of them are worried about privacy, too.
Allscripts
will buy
back its shares held by GE.
Providence
Health Systems does what big companies always do when embarrassed: fire some
scapegoats. They axe
four employees for the "backups
in the back seat" privacy leak on New Year's Eve. I wonder who signed the
policies that authorized that practice, if indeed those existed as suggested?
Merge
Healthcare's stock drops big on the announcement that their earnings statement
will be delayed
until financial audits are completed following its merger with Cedara last May.
Rarely is that uplifting news.
Practice management company and annoyingly
lowercaser athenahealth cranks
up in India.
Guidant is in
trouble for making software changes
to its defibrillators without letting the FDA know until 15 months later.
From
the stock message boards:
Merge
Healthcare
"Linden
is toast. Put a fork in him, he is done!!!!
He is arrogant, smug and
treats people like they are the Ikea deliverymen, unless, of course he
needs you, or you are one of his chosen. He never learned, or practiced that old business adage; 'Be nice to them on the way up, because you meet them on the way down'.
Well he and Veetch are on their way down and out. 'Change is good'.......right Rich!! and they will be changing you out!"
"Wait till Milberg Weiss gets wind of this stock. With all the recent
insider selling by Linden and Veech and this news, Lerach is going to
whack them on the side of the head with a shareholder lawsuit. Then
they are going to have every inch of that office turned upside down.
Get those shredders going boys!"
"My gut reaction is that the management is struggling with the quirky legalities of reporting during a merger year, and are exhibiting more than a slight touch of
paranoia as a result. I don't think the current "problem" will be anything more than a true revenue
timing issue that should sort itself out nicely by Q106's report (meaning that the money's essentially been taken out of one pocket/quarter and
put into the next. Of course, that would mean higher revenues and profits for Q106, which I believe will be obvious when they finally
work out the final Q405 report."
WebMD
"In my humble opinion, any cash raised from the sale of either PS or BS
or both less whatever has to be 'given' to WebMD Health to purchase
back Emdeon's net operating loss (which could be in excess of $200
million) will be used to buy back shares of Emdeon further reducing the
number outstanding. The
number outstanding after the buy back will depend on the amount of cash
generated from the sales and what the offer price will be for the HLTH
shares.The cash will not be used for M&A unless it is used by
ViPS because the company sat on over $500 million for over 2 years and
was not able to find a suitable acquisition which would generate more
than the 4% being earned by the cash in Treasury Bills."
Any one else notice that the article about athenahealth started with the
line: "Fortune 500 US-based athenahealth". I don't know how well they are
doing, but Fortune 500 seems a strech. Maybe Fortune 50,000.
The 'offshored' article erred on athenahealth. The company is not in the
Fortune 500, but is on the Inc. 500, which measures growth and not size.