Announcing the Winners of
"The 2005 HISsies:
The Brutally Honest Healthcare Information System
Awards"
Nominated and Voted On by the Readers of HIStalk
|
Smartest vendor
strategic move: |
Discussion
Not
everyone will be happy to walk away a winner of a 2005 HISsie Award. They aren't
called brutally honest for nothing! Read the bland rags if you like not being
able to tell the ads from the filler, but readers here speak freely (apparently!)
If
you're displeased with the result, take comfort in the fact that nothing about
this process was scientific or even necessarily unbiased. HIStalk readers nominated
and voted as they pleased. Maybe they represent general industry feelings, maybe
not. Don't take this survey entirely seriously, but on the other hand, don't
discount it completely just because it wasn't conducted by earnest new graduates
wearing shiny suits.
We jumped right in with a probing question.
Which vendor's 2004 strategy was the smartest? Epic had a strong showing for
simply staying privately held, but MEDITECH
prevailed for doing exactly what Howard Messing said when I interviewed him
not long ago ... they just kept executing the same boring, wildly successful
strategy that has made them the quiet giant of the industry.
On the other
hand, which vendor's strategy blew up in their face? No contest -- Cerner's
hiring of Indian "associates" (their term) obviously rankled quite
a few folks, despite the company's half-hearted rationalizations involving
time zones and globalization. Personally I think the wording of the survey question
was a bit leading, but it was what the reader nominated, and so it goes. Lots
of vendors are using cheap offshore labor, but I think it was Cerner's righteous
indignation that won it for them.
Who made the big industry sale of
2004? IDX's UK business got a lot of votes, but the winner was MEDITECH
(you'll begin to see a theme here, but other vendors' employees and customers
were just as welcome here as MEDITECH's, so no bellyaching about ballot box
stuffing if your company's people didn't care enough to vote.) It wasn't splashed
all over the headlines, but it was big.
Who do you trust most among vendors?
Epic has its fans, but in the end it was MEDITECH
2:1 over the Madison hippies. Boston wins again!
It was an almost equal
split in the category of "vendor you trust least." For three of the
four nominees, that is. Cerner
won this one in a yawner, with five times the votes of the second-place finisher.
The
"Best Provider IT Organization" was hard, because few of us have personal
experience with the nominees. A good number of folks skipped this question,
and certainly you could argue that lots of good candidates weren't nominated.
Still, we'll play the cards we were dealt and proudly name Brigham
and Womens Hospital as the country's
best healthcare IT organization. Congratulations!
Who's the best vendor
to work for out there in HIS-land? Once again, it was Epic and MEDITECH vying
for the win, with MEDITECH
winning the big prize. Hey, even if it was MEDITECH employees doing a lot of
the voting, that's pretty darned impressive.
That takes us to the second
biggest blowout of the survey. Who's the worst employer in the healthcare IT
industry? According to 80% of the respondents, it's Cerner.
I'm beginning to feel bad for them. They aren't that bad now, c'mon.
Lots
of folks weren't convinced they'd bet the farm on any healthcare IT company's
stock. Point well taken. Among those who named names, though, IBM
won handily.
Survey respondents believe that electronic
medical records is the most promising
technology development, which easily exceeded the fragmented voting for the
other nominees.
On the other hand, cynical HIStalk readers believe that
Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)
was the most overrated technology of 2004, edging out hand-held devices. If
your company offers CPOE on a PDA, start working one of those award-winning
strategies for 2005, because you just might need it.
OK, the Most Valuable
Information Source of 2005 was a blatant come-on, my injection of vanity into
these otherwise distinguished proceedings. You agreeably voted the party ticket,
giving HIStalk
a blowout win (you just want it to keep coming regularly and free, don't you?)
That amateur rag called The Wall Street Journal got some votes, so maybe I'll
get myself a subscription since I'm pretty sure I've got the HIStalk info down
pat.
You said the biggest industry story of 2004 was Congress's
failure to give David Brailer a relatively insignificant amount of money
to start delivering more than political lip service toward healthcare IT. The
President's since taken up the charge, but all of that pre-election rhetoric
means nothing without some seed money. By the way, the never-ending litany of
HBOC and McKesson executives going to court and/or jail gave it a close call.
You
folks at HIMSS are doing a great job, according to HIStalk readers. The HIMSS
Annual Conference blew away all pretenders
in the "best conference attended" category. No one else was even in
the same ballpark.
CPOE
isn't just the most overrated technology of 2004, it's also the most overused
buzzword. Congratulations to all you vendors and consultants trying to whip this
old nag into winning a race for you. The audience ain't buyin' it.
Congratulations
to Stephanie Reel
of Johns Hopkins for being voted as the most effective CIO in a healthcare organization.
I think I printed her salary here a few weeks back, didn't I? Maybe she's worth
it.
Now we get to the most important, the most longingly awaited two
categories of the entire year. The final two. The big finale.
All the
usual crap aside, who would you pick to have a few beers with? Judy Faulkner
bagged some votes, but overall you voted just like I did ... you'd love to hang
out with Neil Pappalardo
of MEDITECH and see what he's all about. I'm sure some heavy MEDITECH employee
voting involved helped him cross the finish line, but even so, isn't it cool
if the grunts want to pound brews with the big guy on their own time? Good choice,
and if he wants to hang with me as a representative of everyone who voted, I'd
be happy to report back.
Last and probably least, the "pie in the
face" category." I struggled with the wording of this very important
category as I created the survey. Should it be "biggest windbag,"
"most annoying," or "least sincere?" Finally, a stroke of
genius: let readers apply their own subjectivity by simply naming the person
in whose face they'd most like to throw a pie, regardless of their thought process.
Whatever pushed their buttons was fine with me, and with only two nominees,
apparently the pushing was nearly universal. Dave Garets of HIMSS Analytics
gave a surprisingly strong showing (good job, Dave) but we all knew he
wouldn't be able to compete with Cerner's Neal
Patterson and his 87% of the popular
vote. Since the KC papers accuse me of being anti-Cerner, let me say that I
admire the guy and his company as leaders of our industry, and also chime in
that at least people care enough to want to see him take a lemon meringue right
in the kisser. I'm sure everyone voted in the spirit of good, clean fun (didn't
you?) Let me lay down a disclaimer here and how, however: if some zealot actually
follows through with the pie thing, I had nothing to do with it.
That's
it, the 2005 HISsie Awards are ovah. Thanks to all who voted, congratulations
and/or condolences to the winners, and maybe we'll do it again next year. Congratulate
the winners at HIMSS since I bet every one of them will be in Dallas!
I wonder if you could let us know how many people voted?
No Name
Just a few hundred. Maybe not quite as many as I'd hoped, but enough to
indicate a trend, even an unscientific one. More participation in the
nominations would have been the best improvement since choices were narrow
in some case, but on the other hand, many places do their own nominating
anyway.